WINDOWS SEVEN EXPERIENCE

My last 6 days with Seven Windows and that factors took to me to put it like unique operating system of my computer.
It would want to clarify before they jump the Linuxeros, that from year 1998 I frequent world GNU with the first distribution in Spanish which I bought with its corresponding packaging (book, manual, extended support to them) for that one CONNECTIVE time LINUX based on RedHat 6, happening until today through: 9 RedHat 7,2, Mandrake and its predecessor Mandriva, Debian, SUSE, Slackware, and for about 3 years so commented Ubuntu.
Thus that I repeat, before they jump; they read post, I know the Linux world very well understand that it is not for being inferior it but to speak of the characteristics of the new Seven Windows.



Beginning describing the used computer to prove the Seven Windows:

Processor: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
Mother: ASUS P5W DH Deluxe
Memory: 4 GB Kingston of 667 Mhz with latency 2-2-2-3 distributed in 4 banks of 1GB c/u
Discs: 2 Hitachi of 250GB c/u interface S-ATA2 with 8 MB of Breaks c/u
Video: 2 ATI Radeon HD3850 of 512 MB c/u in CrossFire
Opticians: 2 DVD-RW Pionner Interface the SAT // 1 DVD-RW ASUS LightScribe Interface IDE
Source: PoowerCooler TypeR 800W Modular
Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 997 of 19 ' '

Additional and Peripheral:
1 Printer EPSON C92 by USB
1 Webcam Kocom 88i by USB
1 generic GamePad with Vibrator by USB
1 Tuning Plate of TV LifeView FlyVideo 3000 with FM in slot PCI
1 Wi-Fi Antenna that comes built-in the Mother
1 Cable CA-42 to connect Nokia 6020
1 Digital Chamber Nikkon L14 of 7,1 MP
1 MP4 of 2da Generation of 2 GB



First that I did very same day 9 when it was finished unloading it went to record it to a DVD and to install it in a virtual machine running under WindowsXP SP3 to which I nothing else put 2048 of ram and priority to him for the use of 2 nuclei. This one installation from the reading IDE I have been 22 minutes of clock (counted) until I had in front of my the writing-desk. By questions of compatibility of my old version of VMWARE 6 it did not have the active Aero since the surroundings are Direct3D no acceleration nevertheless generally seemed incredibly fluid. I am not going to lie to them worked very well with as soon as the 8 MB of video that reserves the virtual machine to the video. That installation did not last nor 2 hours to me that I happened to create backup of my loose things in the writing-desk and my temptation to see it walk with the 100% of the computer made me create a partition of 16 GB in which to install it and to begin little by little to prove all the programs that I frequent and drivers of devices that I have.
Arriving the 02:00 hs of the 10 from January I began to directly install it from the recorded DVD. This one installation from SAT recorder I take until I opposite had the writing-desk mine 16 minutes (counted with clock).



Neither or it finishes appearing the writing-desk of which I am going to make a section later, we were with the same assistants of VISTA Windows who allow us to form the users and the infrastructure that has our network.
By questions of own organization I do not like to use another account that is not the one of administrator reason why to this initial assistant I put ASDJFKZARAZA to him as user name and I eliminated soon it from the equipment administrator.
Them request to do just like I, consider that the account administrator comes deshabilitada by defect so when eliminating user ASDJFKZARAZA enters the properties of the account Administrator and thus removes the tilde to the option “Disabled” when they reinitiate the computer directly takes the session to them of Administrator.
With respect to the other part of the initial assistant, the unique difference that I found, is that, since makes Windows SERVER 2008, to share archives within our dominion we can “protect” the archives with a password.



The first starting when it finishes settling and it reinitiates for the first time… leaves very many that to wish. It approximately takes about 60 seconds, nevertheless after installing drivers of video, sound and the very same ESET Smart Security the starting since apreto the button of ignition of my computer takes about 25 seconds (timed) equal I even clarify is reativo, sometimes takes but sometimes less, but it does not surpass the 30 seconds in the worse one of the cases. They consider that 70% of the programs some unnecessary entrance in the starting generate, so they are cleaning the entrance “Run” and “RunOnce” of the registry, with some program allows that it (except the TuneUp) later I explain so that, and after reinitiated 3 or 4 they are going to notice that the starting of UNDER is very many but quick that WindowsXP even. Please they do not come to me to compare against a SuricataOS or some unheeded one of nastiness because if we began to remove services that are unnecessary in Windows 7 (thing that I did) I assure to them that it takes that those far better. In my case the attending software of the sound plate is quite heavy in the load, is the one that more use of processor has.
It would want to think that those that also use the ultilidad of NVIDIA Desktop are going to notice the very relative starting, but consider the benefits that Windows 7 offers are superiors much from the beginning.



Eh here a brief description of which things I made to optimize the starting (that of in case already it is very good). Lamentablemete the TuneUp in its version 2009 does not even work in Windows7 reason why I was myself forced to resort to the classic MSCONFIG to be eliminating the things that they try to start at the beginning of my system. There am an image here after installing absolutely everything what it interested to me, I left the starting this way:



With respect to which they are services, the thing can vary much based on the atmosphere in which they use the computer. I recommend to them that they try to read and to interpret or the explanations of the services, to observer or the dependencies of each before deshabilitar it because they can bring problems to him to the system, in any case if they do not include/understand so that it serves each service, ask to him Google Pope or directly THEY DO NOT TOUCH IT.
I leave an image them of which services I deactivated in my case and as I put in manual:
(The image Is too great in pixels reason why the support to make the Hotlink is no host that and to put it in Taringa)

http://rapidshare.com/files/186348774/SERVICIOS.bmp.html

The image car I adjust to the size of T! they keep but it in its PC's will be able to see better each service and its description.



It could put a video to them of the YouTube of the new characteristics of the Desktop de Windows Seven but I prefer to tell my personal experience them. The truth, the comfort and simplicity is inexplicable, I can tell many functions nevertheless them until they do not use it are not going away to give to account the practitioner who is.
Of entrance we already can observe what it was always requested of Windows, that did not exist pixeladas things. It is that they use or not the Aero, in any resolution we can even notice a clearness superior to the one of VISTA that in some elements still showed pixelaciones.

At first sight we observed a much more ample bar of tasks in which the fast beginning megres and at which we can add applications to our taste without they occupy space while the application in himself, is open, since it does not have text labels either, we say is “a grouped” mixture of “fast beginning” with that we had from WindowsXP. Many say that in this new disposition it is difficult to choose a window in particular if there are many grouped. But to the daily use it is not thus because one just by is to happen above through of the button a previous view of all the windows in real time, even if there is a video reproducing. Something similar to the “Window Preview” that has the COMPIZ FUSION of Linux.
Certain programs even acquire special options on that new disposition, as they are it Internet Explorer, the complete package of Live Windows, and Windows Media Player.
In the case of Internet Explorer the eyelashes are treated like windows different for the miniones from the windows, which gives a comfort when exquisite sailing, the Live Windows incorporates the typical actions like SENDING AND TO RECEIVE, to change between states AVAILABLE, OCCUPIED, ETC… and but worked of that are the integration of Windows Media Player which in the small previous view incorporates the reproduction controls (ANTERIOR-PAUSA/PLAY-SIGUIENTE)
Obvious if this radical change in the form to develop in Windows does not finish to them convincing can put the classic bar with the small labels and icons but, without losing the functionalities of the previous views.

The menu beginning very similar to the one of VISTA has very improved the search and better worked the bellboys of extinguished who as much were criticized in their predecessor.
The others do not change much, if they have resources to lose in his system can qualify indexed and Recent Documents those that help much if they are disorderly.





Something similar the windows to those of Vista Windows, bring few innovations, among them they emphasize extreme diffuseness and simplicity given in view of tree of the left and the interminable forms to be able to accommodate the views of the folders in himself. Grouped, box-like, and ordinates by the field of properties of the archives that we want. The previous views by type of file beyond the predetermined program to initiate them are excellent at the time of knowing if we are in front of a video or photo.





One of the things that fascinated to me more of this Seven Windows is the concept of Bookstores that are adding. It will do 5 years invited to me through TECHNET (group of developer of Microsoft to that I am registered) to a seminary on the main platforms where it was going to run VISTA Windows… AVALON+WinFS (Obvious nothing than I saw I implement myself completely even) but the bookstores are a step near it more.
It is difficult to explain but MS tries to eliminate the FOLDER concept. That is to say, the archives are going to have an exploration location, something as well as an attribute of the field of a relational table. But in the disc they are physically going to be like gigantic Base de Datos, which would accelerate much the searches because the indexed one would be magnificent, would improve or we say would allow to improve the fragmented one of the disc, and would be a step the more close elimination or at least the reduction of so criticized REGISTRY of Windows.
But good it is enough of the technical aspects, to this you are going it you to see reflected if it costs to them to be ordered. To what I talk about? The best example I can be given with the following thing. I have in my second disc a called folder My Music, which contains mp3 organized by artists and within each artist its albums. Nevertheless also I have a folder my music within My Documents there were since it in Windows XP, and another equal which I use with my manager of unloading, this way with the bookstores we can have a folder “My unified Music” with archives in different locations, and even if that location is a DVD or a MP4 or we can add them to a PenDrive to the bookstore to the archives in any case, that when we want to reproduce that file multimedia (it is image, sound or video) will solicit to us to enter means where this one is. This way we would be doing without a program as it can be WMP12, or Winamp, or i-Tunes, to create the bookstore of music or Picassa, or Kodak for the images.



They will be able to observe in the second image as for a same folder we can “point” several means locations to him different.



In this section I go to detail the programs that I frequent and its yield under Seven Windows.
Beginning by the anti-virus use the “ESET Smart Security Bussines” deactivating obvious the so obsolete Firewall de Windows which did not improve much lamentably. As much the modules of AntiVirus and AntiSpyware as the one of Firewall works without no disadvantage.

What is the suite of Creative Suite Adobe, I installed the CS3 which works very well, nevertheless I with this risk to me to prove the CS4 having left completes due to his incredible speed and integration with DirectX 11 that offer surroundings me of excellent work of great benefits. I had the luck to prove Photoshop, Premiere, and Audition. Which did not bring problems to me, so I imagine no other program of the suite must have problems.

Mozilla Firefox works of thousand wonders, although it is slightly displaced at attractive level his basic Theme, reason why I recommend to unload the Theme similar Chromifox to the Google Chrome, or the Aero Windows to him that makes similar to Internet Explorer.

Virtual Dub, the small but most powerful manipulator of videos programmed in C++ works without disadvantages, and in their last version doing use of the multiple nuclei.

JDownloader well-known and powerful manager of automated unloadings works perfectly as long as it is had installed completes JAVA version.

JAVA Engine works without no problem in his completes version.

You plow works perfectly in his completes version.

Crystal Player works perfectly in his completes version with the disadvantage of which the MultiSampling and the SuperSamplig must be deactivated in case of sampling the video with DirectDrawn or leaving them active and to deshabilitar the DirectDrawn for the Crystal Player.
In any case they use VLC that is slightly but personalizeable.

DivX 7 works without problems being useful incredible way the 4 nuclei. It compresses formed in HIGH QUALITY (10) videos of 720x478 to but of 55 FPS and brings built-in support for the Matroska container of native form.

Google Earth works perfect.

Office 2007 works but that well, this completely integrated with the surroundings supporting transparencies in the Ribbon appearance even.

Nero 8 works without no disadvantage, although I do not like much, the 7,5 tends to hang itself enough. Reason why I recommend use the 8 or 9 but pasense to some other alternative as it can be the Ashampoo Burning Studio that is super compact.

Quick Time works perfect in his completes version.

WinRAR is discounted works perfectly.

YahooWidgets (in particular I like but that those of Windows) works perfectly.

Free Circle Dock or Stardock Object Dock works perfectly if they are to let itself take by the EyeCandy.

Messenger works perfectly, as much the Live Messenger as Yahoo Messenger. The others as Google Talk I did not prove them, I have if understood that Skype not yet has support and not even it is let install.

Google Chrome does not even have support not even is let install and if it does in compatibility way it tends to be very unstable.



I had opportunity to prove the following games that are few because I am not to play much:

Pro Evolution Soccer 2009: It shows an incredible improvement in the illumination.

Crysis 1: The resolutions, but nothing significant improve the FPS when increasing, considering that the new API Direct2D load as much to the plate of video not to maintain the effects of the operating system.

FarCry2: Very good improvement of effects HDR without loss of FPS. Equal note that the CryEngine2 de Crytek abuses hardware and takes advantage of little the instructions DirectX.

Counter Strike Source: Remarkable stability of FPS where before a little perhaps oscillated. A flash or detonation of distinguished pump/if before they lowered some FPS now no longer.

MotoGP 2 and 3: Differences with WindowsXP are not seen.

GrandPrix 4: Differences with WindowsXP are not seen.

Call of Duty 4: Improvement of the FPS increasing the resolution.

For Need Speed Coal: Differences with WindowsXP are not seen.

For Need Speed Undercover: They improve the quality of the effects but it does not contribute much to the general yield of the game that of in case it leaves much to be desired.

Conclusion? Note that DirectX11 is a mature product, that concerning games of the new generation contributes very many and if the developers know to make use of him can promise enough when it is finished for year end.



Seven Windows in spite of being in version BETA1 works of thousand wonders, I am I mediate capricious and do not like much to have distributed I in my rigid disc a folder for each platform, that is to say I do not like to have: Program Files x86 and Program Files x64, Documents and Settings x86 and Documents and Settings x64, reason why I did not install the version of 64-Bit besides the slight untidiness, that many of my Drivers have support for Windows XP not even. So the one that can and has the sufficient machine installs x64 that surely must very enormously walk better taking advantage of the intrucciones 64-Bit.
Remote note that Microsoft put hands to the work to content to his I publish myself and to return to gain the market. It would want to think that at enterprise level if the product this demonstrates to be the advance that it even pretends in its final version. The license is worth the pain. Hopefully it is truth which sometimes I read in T! that the people of Stardock were engaged by MS to develop the GUI of the new Windows. If this is therefore the difference it is beginning to mark…



Them right of perpetual ownership that I filmed 5 minutes of video showing the new typical of the writing-desk and the fluidity with which one moves. But… God! to raise to a video 640x480 of 80 MB (compressed) YouTube with 16 Kbps of upload is a childbirth. I am lodging them in RapidShare, that does not do conversion of format nor anything. When it finishes raising I publish the Post and I add the Link.

PUBLISHED POST (1): I am finished raising the video that I filmed, that it interests to see it to him can do, to unload: http://rapidshare.com/files/184191291/VIDEO_WIN7.avi

PUBLISHED POST (2): They are patient gentlemen since today to afternoon I am going to install Seven Windows in my viejito AMD Sempron 2800+ with 1024 of ram DDR1 (400 Mhz) and one 2 GeForce MX 440 of 64 MB. Computer which uses my old man to record CD's and to see some that another film of DVD in the Television.


Source: Absolutely all the screen captures, the future videos and the information are of my property and on the basis of my experience with this UNDER.

From Windows SEVEN it is desired many successes please them and THEY COMMENT! that it is my first Post and it cost much to do it.



PUBLISHED POST (3): What all were hoping, my review of Seven Windows in other computers, of inferiors benefits. One is the computer of my cousin, who was astonished at the comfort of use and the light similar EyeCandy to the one at VISTA which did not know. The computer of my father that I mentioned previously and one but old mine of year 2001.

COMPUTER I NUMBER 1

Processor: AMD Athlon 64 x2 (Dual 2,13 Core) of Ghz c/u
Motherboard: ASUS M2A-VM
Video: Integrated to the Mother model ATI X1250 - VRAM: Shared 128 MB
Memory: 2GB DDR2 distributed in 2 banks of 1 GB c/u (Dual Chanel)
Sound: On-Board Realtek HD of 5,1 Channels
Disc: 1 Maxtor S-ATA2 of 160 GB
Opticians: 1 DVD-RW Sony SAT interface


What is the instalción I realise in the same time average that in my computer and that in the virtual machine. I am sincere not to time it but I do not surpass the 25 minutes.


In the assistants nothing new noticed.


As it happened with my computer the 2 first reinitiated they left a bad flavor of mouth. Escesivamente slow but as it is used note that the “Superfetch” is optimizing the system in spite of adding enough entrances in the registry (Run and RunOnce).


With respect to this there are many disappointments. The proven programs are very similar, minimal Nero, Messenger, Firefox, and things like QuickTime, Player Flash, Shockwave, PowerDVD and Winamp. From my point of view, the programs work ALL SLOW ones, take in abrir between 2 or 3 seconds just being ignited the awhile long PC and after using it when already note that the load in the system is important, takes between 5 to 6 seconds but… Furthermore note that is excessive the use of the file of pagination in spite of having 1920 MB available of ram.
By but optimization that can be realised the consumption of ram just initiated it is of 800 MB, which increase based on the executed application.


In spite of this computer to excatamente have excatamente the same plate of sound that in mine, we noticed that the sound when reproducing any file multimedia is video or music, brings with himself a noise as if it was a gogórito, gárgara, unloading electrcia as they want to call it. Trying to almost simple view we occurred account that whatever but windows are in the writing-desk and nonprograms in particular, but simple windows. But the noise was increased. Consequently I inclined to suppose that: The 128 MB of hardly ROAR were not sufficient to move the Aero Windows (beyond the support or no, for Direct3D that can have, or not it plate). Installing programs I had to reinitiate and I happened to increase the amount of IT ROAR to 512 MB obtaining like result a very good diminution of the noise. Nevertheless not solved because when reproducing music the noise was not and when reproducing videos IF. Increasing the videos ROAR as much to 1024 MB as music stopped having noise, at the expense of an ENORMOUS LOSS OF YIELD in the operating system generally due to only the 1024 MB that were of diponible memory.
They do not come to me to say that it is a problem of Driver because probe as much those of Windows XP, as those of VISTA Windows, like which of in case already it brings the same Windows SEVEN.


Note that the processor exceeds with respect to speed, but that due to being a machine that shares many resources with the different devices for being on-board has a yield slightly inferior.
In any case and responding to many of the questions that did to me by Deprived Message, if they have plate of Video ON-BOARD nor are bothered in putting Seven Windows less than to have not less than 3GB of ram like sharing 1 GB with the Video and leaving other 2 GB for Windows.
Also we spin but fine with respect to the technical aspects. These 533 memories are of 667 Mhz and not of Mhz like mine. One goes that is to say that latency they have and that so good can be the Chipset Realtek that brings that Mother. Mine beyond being Realtek also, at least brings certification THX, and DOLBY DIGITAL (in a aside viniero manual the certifications) so the possibility fits that is not very optimal the Chip of Sound of that mother.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPUTER I NUMBER 2

Processor: AMD Semprom 2600+ (1,8 Ghz)
Motherboard: ASUS A7V-400 MX
Video: ATI 9200 of 128 MB ROAR
Memory: 1GB DDR2 (400 Mhz) Without Dual Chanel
Sound: On-Board Realtek AC97
Disc: 1 Maxtor S-ATA2 of 80 GB
Opticians: 3 DVD-RW Pioneer, Sony, Lite-On SAT interface


What is the instalción had a considerable increase of time in the part of “Expansion of Arhivos” but it walked near the time of installation of a normal WindowsXP 35-40 Minutes.


In the assistants nothing new noticed.


In spite of the immense difference of processing the starting respondio in the same way in reinitiated 4 or 5. Slow but, in accordance with that is used and reinitiating it improves considerably the starting obtaining times similar to those of my computer.


Here I do not have much to say since the computer this is used to store music and to record it (notese the amount of recorders). But the proven programs were: Roxio Easy Average Creator 9, 8 NTI CD Maker (version of the 2007), PowerDVD and DivX 7.
In yield they walked very well all the programs except the Roxio which is a shark hungry of ram memory. Although the programs did not execute with the speed of a “Quad Core” so it is the PC initiate and carry out we say “Just as in WindowsXP”


Unlike the previous computer problems with the plate of Sound in spite of being also did not exist Realtek. I want to think that he is by the great aid of the plate of Video AGP (8X) which leaves the 100% of the resources of the processor available for the S.O.
Nevertheless the plate of video in itself is quite obsolete at the time of executing certain EyeCandy as they are it the excessive Flip3D or transparencies, or the protectors of screen with OpenGL support


We can say that the performance went to regulate to bad with the few programs that tried on but considering the Aero. When deactivating we noticed it that the yield generally improved like saying that is similar to Windows XP. Obvious using the bar of tasks like before and eliminating all possible writing materials.





As many there are saying to me, “… if it does not walk to you with that PC, it does not serve…” but I have certain doubts that I am going to try to unload to me as rapidly as possible and explain why: It is not for being fanatical of AMD or Intel but… since I had my 233 Pentium2 MMX of Mhz with 64 MB of ram the Windows 98SE and desastrozo Millenium Mhz with the same 64 MB of ram walked better there than in my 500 AMD-K2 of. To another I can give it example with my Pentium3 of 800 Mhz in which WindowsXP (the version of the 2002) worked of wonders with 256 MB of ram and not as well as in my AthlonXP 2000+ (1,733 Mhz) with the same 256 of ram.
At that I aim? to that the alliance Microsoft/Advanced Micro Devices is not of the best ones. Processors AMD are novel in innovate new instructions all along, but they run behind how the people of are them to Microsoft programming and optimizing for Intel.

the attention calls much to me not to have had so good results with the AMD Athlon 64 x2 and 2 GB of ram as far as yield, reason why I am going to look for to prove the Seven Windows in a similar computer but Intel line. We suppose something as well as a Core2 Pair E6200. Neither or step has the results them to make POST EDIT (4) and to comment to them that so it was to me and to corroborate if my theory is correct.



PS: I am thankful infinitely to that they cotribuyeron with its commentaries, with its constructive critics, I am thankful for the seriousness with which thought many since it did not try to arm to a “forum bard”. I almost thank for with tears doing to me FullUser. I promise to comment each thing that sees, from the great huevada one but to but the interesting ones as well as to continue doing post that is worth the pain. I will take in finding something interesting to contribute with T! I will do but it with quality.
Again thousand thanks to cause that my first post is top post of the week in less than 24 hs. (emotion)

PUBLISHED POST (4): The Link of unloading of Seven Windows is added for they need which it. One occurs him thanks to Taringuero: DesingFenix2008 which armed post put and it at the disposal of all we:

http://www.taringa.net/posts/downloads/1992340/Windows-Seven-1-Link-BETA-(32bits-y-64bits).html

PUBLISHED POST (5): One is divided the image of the Services in 2 but small ones so that it does not overload the bandwidth of the Server Host.

PUBLISHED POST (6): The images of ImageHost are corrected which are not seen (God mine is no a single host of Images that does not request my number to me of credit card and that is good obvious). Desagradezco to the administrator who erased post complete and I am thankful infinitely to which it he has returned to put in line. For that one first administrator I explain the following thing to him: info published somehow gained the acceptance of all. Nevertheless always the studies estan out of position that makes the things by but intelligent bad or that they have. I, no matter how hard she is my post, do not have authority to censure to anybody, eliminating the commentary to him. In case of doing it surely I am going away to gain a denunciation (to criterion of the censured one) because it does not have freedom of expression. I do not believe either that it is necessary to close the commentaries because they will have seen that him 80% of the same, are valid, setting out their experience or although but it is not being thankful. In any case who yes they have authority for hacelo is the ADMINES, but obvious erasing the quilombero commentary and not all the post.



PUBLISHED POST (7): Step to be completes modification on post. I request excuses to have taken in testing last. I know that to many they are going away to feel disappointed but, from my point of view the things are as comment in the end.

COMPUTER I NUMBER 3

Processor: Intel Core2 Pair E6400 (2,13 Ghz)
Motherboard: MSI P6N-SLI
Video: ATI X1650 of 256 MB ROAR
Memory: 2 GB DDR2 (NOT THAT FSB I WANT TO THINK THAT 533 or 667) Dual Chanel
Sound: Realtek HD
Discs: 1 Hitachi S-ATA2 of 80 GB + 1 Samsung S-ATA2 of 250 GB
Opticians: 2 DVD-RW Pioneer SAT Interface



As it were to be expected in a computer average the installation was realised quickly and it did not surpass the 25 minutes.



In the assistants nothing new noticed.



The starting since the ignition button is pressed does not surpass the 25 seconds.



Of incredible form and for disappointment of many one did not notice the difference between this one PC and mine. The 2 GB of ram did not notice with any program that lack. (I clarify that I installed the same that in mine). Nor either the aid of great plates of video. At level desepeño as operating system really works very fast. Games did not try on because I had to give it to the computer quickly to its original owner. But for daily work, it works excellent.



The performance conformed to me much more than it hoped after the disappointment of COMPUTER 1, incredibly note after proving it in these 2 practically similar machines (COMPUTER 1 and COMPUTER 3) that Seven Windows comes somehow optimized slightly so that it works better in Intel Processors.
Not only I say by the tests mine to it, but also by the endless ones of private messages that I received from disappointed people those who said to me that in its AMD Windows 7 worked just as a WindowsXP or in some cases worse.
In the 2 Intel that I tried not at least noticed slowing down in the programs even after generating an important load to him with others, as they are it the Nero, any application of Office or even very same Photoshop CS4. It will be that it releases better the memory in Intel that in AMD? It will be that light the differences in Mhz of the memories notice so much? They are things that I am not wanted to put to investigate, simply walks better in Intel than in the AMD, I hope that this one difference is reduced for when the product it is in his final version since abríria a breach great (or but great than already it is) enters the followers one or the other mark of processor.



He would be idiot to put to me to be thankful again, so I summarize everything what this post meant for me, from advice, experience, gratitude, humor, to even quarrel, in which Mr. Gustavo Cerati said sometimes:



Successes for all wish them:


PS: One goes to close the commentaries so that post is of utility a good time, so that bard does not arm itself “to forum”, so that they do not weaken it although they do not injurien mainly to anybody and so that she is fast the load.

POST EDIT (8): I am going to mention the MP that our Taringuero companion “ichramm” sent to me due to not being able to comment:

A machine installs the version of 64 bits with:
Plate: ASUS M2N-MX
CPU: AMD Athlon 4000+
Ram: 1024 MB Kingston (667 MHz)
Disco1: IDE TIES 133 80GB (in this it installs Win7)
Disco2: SATA2 of 80GB
Video: nVIDIA 6150SE 128 of ram dedicated but until 384MB shared

Instalé to Win7 for two weeks and the truth I have not been able to be complained
- Firefox takes much more fast that Windows XP
- The Modem USB also raises but fast that with Windows XP
- The effects of Aero are much more fluid that with Vista Windows
- I do not have problems if I raise 3 instances of the Studio Line of vision, client of the SQL server, etc (that if, if I put to him but I remain without ram)
- Thanks to God this Windows Defender not breaking…
- And good, not that but, ah! woman also him taste jeje
- I do not have any type of noise when audio reproducing, as much music as films
- Pity that I do not work google chrome

Greetings, and please posteá this therefore others see that with giga of ram the bank.

CONLUSION? If they are not maníaticos of the games, the Seven Windows makes honor to which it is: an operating system. It does not have much more to say draw his conclusions.